Empirical Research on Romantic Love Published in Peer Reviewed Journals

Abstract

Beloved is a fundamental emotion in people's lives, and also plays a vital role in human health. It is a multifaceted feeling, with different expressions in different life contexts. Its polysemy has been widely identified and analysed upon observing how the dissimilar styles of experiencing love have different effects on personal and relational health. This article presents a review of literature regarding the influence of the various honey styles—identified by Lee [1]—on quality and duration of a love relationship, and how they may be predictors for the wellness and well-existence of partners. Upon analysis of the diverse reviewed articles, it is recorded that the various honey types and styles take dissimilar furnishings on various levels of quality and elapsing of the relationship between ii people. On the footing of the results observed, the authors suggest numerous inquiry priorities in order to facilitate the implementation of knowledge through actions targeted towards relational health and well-being.

Share and Cite:

Raffagnino, R. and Puddu, L. (2018) Love Styles in Couple Relationships: A Literature Review. Open up Journal of Social Sciences, 6, 307-330. doi: x.4236/jss.2018.612027.

1. Introduction

Dear, a widely discussed topic in literature and art for centuries, has as well go an interesting theme in psychology, every bit it is considered an important emotion in the life of a human being. It stimulates people, fifty-fifty in cultures across the Western world, to commit to lasting relationships, such as union or cohabitation [2], and this has relevant repercussions on the life and development of men and women, who thus ensure a necessary rearing for children and develop their social intelligence and cooperative skills [3].

Beloved is a feeling that is especially expressed by the people involved in romantic relationships and is considered, along with a number of other factors (such as intimacy, commitment, and affection), one of the nearly significant components for a satisfying relationship [4] and for its elapsing [v]. These are aspects that, within the wider scope of relationship quality, are related to subjective well-being, especially in terms of happiness, life satisfaction, and the existence of more than positive past experiences as opposed to negative feelings [4] [6].

On the other hand, love relationships tin can also be a source of stress, discomfort, struggle, pain, and negative feelings, peculiarly when associated with dependence and obsessive behaviour, which may negatively affect the quality and duration of a relationship [7] [eight] [ix]. In certain cases, information technology is recorded how love may also be translated to pathological love (PL) that, although not diagnostically referred to as a clinical disorder, is alloyed in enquiry―even neurophysiology research―to psychopathologies related to substance and behavioural addictions [10].

This expression of love in its healthy and pathological connotation [11] [12] already hints the polysemy of the feeling, which is in any case confirmed by numerous studies that point out the diverse ways and peculiarities of living and expressing it in dissimilar human relationship types (friendly, romantic, parental, etc.) and within the same romantic human relationship [xiii] [14].

Throughout the years, different classifications of love accept been hypothesized and are widely present in empirical literature as important points of reference for the development of psychological knowledge in the field. Berscheid and Walster [15] proposed an initial distinction betwixt passionate dearest―an intense emotion distinguished by a strong desire to bond with one's partner―and companionate dear, which implies feelings such as amore and tenderness. In literature, we may also notice another kind of dearest, called compassionate dearest (CL), a feeling oriented towards care, assistance, and worrying for another, who may even be a partner in a romantic human relationship, especially if suffering and needy [16]. Because the dissimilar attitudes people accept towards romantic honey, Lee [1] has identified and coded six beloved styles: three are primary and 3 are secondary. Primary styles include Eros (passionate, romantic love), Ludus (playful honey), and Storge (friendly love). Styles considered secondary, beingness combinations of ii primary styles, include: Mania (obsessive or addictive love), a combination of Eros and Ludus; Pragma (applied, rational dear), a combination of Storge and Ludus; and Agape (donating/unselfish love), including Eros and Storge (in Table 1, nosotros present a brief clarification of the main characteristics of each honey way). It is one of the most utilized classifications of dearest, and too the most structured, complete, and focused on romantic relationships. It is no coincidence that it was the basis for the development of a tool called the Dear Attitude Scale (LAS) [17], which measures the 6 love styles and is unremarkably used in research. It has also been adjusted to dissimilar countries―including Italy [18] ―as a proof of its reliability and validity.

Tabular array 1. Brief description of love styles.

Some of the components of the six love styles seem to have common traits with those used in other classifications [19], which nonetheless appear more general and less specific to love relationships. For instance, the altruistic attitude of the Agape dearest mode is comparable to the empathetic love type, although the erstwhile focuses on romantic relationships, whilst the latter is conceived as a honey type that may exist experimented to accomplish a wide range of goals, including relationships with a partner, simply also with friends, family, strangers, or even humanity as a whole [xx]. Neto [21] recorded that empathetic love may be correlated to four of the six beloved styles: positively with Eros and Agape, and negatively with Ludus and Pragma, while he found no link to Storge and Mania. Passionate love has been identified past Acevedo and Aron [7] as a combined measure out of romantic beloved and obsession, and Graham [9] observed how information technology shows a correlation to Eros or Mania.

In order to empathise if and how the various love styles may explain a possible variability in a beloved relationship and its quality―fifty-fifty with respect to personal and relational well-being―we here present a literature review that may aid empathise what empirical studies accept focused on the field of study affair. Such review may be useful in defining farther outlets in research and in cess and preventive praxes related to the health and well-existence of partners in a relationship. In fact, acknowledging how―and on which levels―the different styles can influence the human relationship both every bit risk factors and as resources may assist target the prevention functioning towards crucial details to act on in order to promote an improved relational quality.

2. Method

2.1. Procedure

To identify and assess the articles relevant to the review, the research group devised some inclusion/exclusion criteria to choose papers relevant for this review. These criteria regard: publications in peer review journals; focus on love styles distinguished by Lee and exclusion of papers that focused on other beloved taxonomies; focus on both marital quality/stability and relational dimensions; expert quality of the research method and its accurate description in the paper.

In order to identify the studies and research projects relevant to this review, we accept used electronic databases such equally ScienceDirect, PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar. The most office of the papers were collected from Google Scholar and ScienceDirect. We have considered papers in English and Italian published from 2004 to this twenty-four hour period, implementing the meta-assay proposed by Masuda [22] as a means of synthesis of the research results. Masuda studied the correlation between relational satisfaction and ii love types―passionate and companionate―measured past ways of diverse tools applied to the most widespread theories. It was thus a more express review―in terms of the variables considered―compared to the i presented in this article, but that in whatsoever case offered a framework of the state-of-the-art up until the date of its publication, and which supported the difference between Lee's theory and other theoretical models of dearest, giving credit to the greater elaboration of the old.

The following cardinal words and key discussion combinations have been used for this review: love or love style and marital quality, marital stability, marital satisfaction, marital well-being and health.

2.2. Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria

We have included studies and research projects published from 2004 to 2018 that analyse the love way topic, along with variables in the quality and duration of the human relationship. We have excluded the ones that did not involve love styles and relational aspects in their assay. In whatever case, in drafting our introduction and discussion/conclusions we have also referenced articles analysing the theme of honey and its classifications in terms of personal, social, and even health and well-being characteristics.

Given that our aim is to provide an initial review of scientific literature on the influence of different dear styles on the quality and duration of the relationship between two people, the research was express to articles of a high methodological quality. We accept in any case considered complete projects published in peer-review journals, and accept excluded summaries presented at seminars, reports introduced at conferences, dissertations, and comment articles that provided only partial information and authors' opinions. We also excluded the articles nosotros accept non managed to retrieve, even upon direct asking to the authors by e-postal service.

2.three. Screening and Material Selection

The articles retrieved accept been assessed by two independent reviewers. They were first selected based upon their title and abstract: 1943 articles to be potentially included in this review were identified on this basis. This initial screening also included papers dealing with love, love types, and love styles, even when not assessing the effects on the quality and duration of the dear relationship. Upon a second selection based upon the titles and abstracts, we identified 235 articles concerning the general topic (dearest, love types, dearest styles) and retrieved their full text. Nosotros added a further 60 articles to these, and ii reviewers have selected the abstract pool on the basis of the relevance of the topic dealt with to this review, and their methodological quality. This process has narrowed the pool to 122 manufactures. Nosotros successively focused only on those that concerned beloved styles in relation to quality and duration aspects in the love relationship, and for the purposes of the analysis we identified a sample of 22 articles (Figure 1).

Each of the 22 articles was analysed in depth, in an try to identify the theoretical ground, the goal and hypotheses, the research design, the procedure and tools utilized, as well as the master results recorded, using a specific, detailed method. In terms of systems and literature research, nosotros have assessed the objectives, methods, and results obtained. As for the results, every publication has been summarized and classified in accordance with the six dear styles described in Lee's theory of love [1]. The method has been deemed by the researchers the most straightforward for a facilitated recognition of the effects of each love style on relational health and well-being. Throughout such phase, some doubts and perplexities well-nigh the inclusion of papers and their methodological quality were discussed between the two researchers, occasionally through the involvement of a tertiary researcher.

3. Results

The 22 manufactures considered in the scope of the review were all published on peer-review international journals; they are for the about function empirical researches, and 3 meta-analyses were as well consulted. An article by Acevedo and Aron [seven] includes, forth with a meta-analysis, even a literature review that nosotros have non considered in our assessment, in that it deals with a more general topic than the one in concern. The articles focus on the correlation between and influence of the diverse love styles on the different variables affecting relational quality, some of which are considered in the same research design. Depending on the situations, the relational dimensions are analysed in combination with dissimilar variables (also regarding―forth with socio-personal and cultural characteristics―well-existence, health, psychopathology and family history), and love styles are considered mediation variables. While by and large the furnishings of love styles on marital quality and stability are analyzed using an individual approach, Gana et al. [23] adopted a dyadic approach and the Thespian-Partner Interdependence Model. This option permitted them to know non only how the love style of ane member touch his/her marital quality perception (role player effect), just also the partner's one.

A widely shared denominator or precondition to the goals formulated in the different research projects analysed in our review is the centrality of love in the construction and maintenance of relational quality, which is oft linked to theories of honey and relationships. An additional recurring common denominator in the assessed papers is the recording of both the contradiction betwixt studies on dear and the lack of knowledge on relevant topics.

three.1. Methodological Characteristics of the Reviewed Research Papers

In terms of methodological characteristics, nosotros shall make a stardom between reviews and empirical research, in that nosotros have adopted unlike method assessment criteria for each. For the reviews, we have identified the blazon, inclusion/exclusion criteria, the number of studies considered past the authors, and the reference population. Every bit for the empirical research projects, we have assessed the method on the ground of the characteristics and origin of the sample, the type of sample, the setting, the procedure, the independent and dependent variables, and the tools used. We take identified 2 reviews, i by Acevedo and Aron [7] and i by Graham [9], both conducting a meta-assay of the enquiry projects assessed. Acevedo and Aron [7] conducted a meta-analysis of 25 researches and studies satisfying specific inclusion/exclusion criteria, including: duration of the relationship; focus on relational satisfaction (dependent variable) and honey styles; romantic, obsessive, and companionate beloved; dimensions such as passion and intimacy (independent variables). Graham [9] selected 81 studies, which were required to: be in English; employ a data drove method based on at least ane of the measurements of dearest most utilized in literature (independent variables); and identify correlations between such metrics and relational variables, such as satisfaction and duration (dependent variables). Graham applied an inter-metric model of correlation that allowed to record mutual characteristics. Almost of the 22 research papers apply a cross-sectional blueprint and a quantitative arroyo. The research projects take been conducted in various different countries and cultures, and especially involved the white-Caucasian ethnic group or, in some cases, other ethnicities merely as a small percentage of the sample [xx] [24] [25]. The only exception was the sample considered in the research past Smith and Klases [26], including 56 participants from the UK (London) and 52 from Hong Kong. Moreover, nosotros found two studies focused on the Islamic population [27] [28] and others presenting a comparison between dissimilar cultures [25] [29].

The sample size ranged from 12 to 1582 participants. The latter were mostly single academy students, though certain researches included married individuals [24] [30] or individuals in a committed dear relationship [30] [31] [32]. The just ii studies that considered (heterosexual) couples as well equally the percent of couples with children are that carried out by Gana et al. [23] and Vedes et al. [33]. Sure studies [34] [35] take considered clinical samples (patients suffering pathological love and jealousy), or partners that have experienced special situations such every bit adulterous [36]. The samples included both females and males; just Honari and Saremi [37] take taken into consideration a female-just pool. The average age varied and the age range in nearly cases was quite broad. For example, in the enquiry conducted by Lin & Huddleston-Casas [30] the range was nineteen to 91 years. Where specified, participants generally belonged to the middle grade [20] [33].

Sampling was generally performed on a voluntary basis, though some authors used random sampling [24] [28]. Although most studies involved persons attending bookish institutions such as universities, in certain cases participants were involved by ways of ad, postings, electronic mail, and other methods [24] [xxx] [33] [34].

More often than not speaking, consent to have part in the enquiry was requested to participants, while in certain studies it was too obtained from the institutions [29] [34].

Most of the research projects used standardized instruments, at times translated in the linguistic communication spoken in the country where the research was conducted, then validated [29] and administered individually. In measuring beloved styles, a broadly used metric is the Beloved Attitudes Scale Curt-Grade (LAS-SF) [38]. Certain studies also adopt measurements designed ad hoc, specially for the assessment of relational dimensions [39], and a single study used the telephone interview method [30]. The most of import data about these aspects are synthetized in Tabular array 2.

3.2. Summary of Data Nowadays in the Research Projects Reviewed

We have classified the results extrapolated from the researches in accord with the 6 honey styles identified by Lee [1]. This arroyo allowed us to organize content in relation to the correlations and influence that the different love styles may have on the health and well-being of a love relationship. At the aforementioned fourth dimension, it allowed us to quote the reviewed articles more than once in case they dealt with more than 1 love fashion.

Table 2. Topic, objectives and methodological characteristics of the reviewed research projects.

Eros dear style and its relational correlates

This manner expresses romantic beloved―distinguished past passion as well as physical and emotional attraction―is widely correlated to a high intensity of the love feeling, quality of life, and subjective well-beingness [xl], as well as healthy dear [34], and the various works analysed appear to ostend its positive value. In fact, it appears to be related to the skilful qualities of a relationship and of married life [28], as well as dyadic satisfaction [9] [twenty] [29] [33] [41]. The positive correlations are stable and exercise not alter over fourth dimension, in that they exist both in short and long-term relationships [7] [nine] and in all age groups [41], nor practise they mutate in different cultures, equally recorded by Galinha et al. [29] who made a comparison between Americans, Mozambicans, and Europeans (Portugal). The positivity of the Eros honey mode is farther attested by the results of researches that take proven its direct associations with specific dimensions, such every bit attachment security [29], the desire for intimate closeness to the partner [31], positive strategies for conflict resolution such every bit compromise [25], and dyadic coping, namely the joint effort by both partners to confront a stressful situation lived by one of the two [33]. Besides, this love style is correlated to commitment in a relationship [twenty] expressed by a couple, which has expectations in terms of its duration, coherently with a romantic conception of honey, as proved by the presence of negative emotions upon conclusion of the relationship [39]. Karandashev et al. [42] have recorded that in the initial phase of the relationship, Eros causes a decrease in avoidance, and anxiety diminishes, as part a dimension of the couple's bonding process. Every bit a further proof that the honey manner is positive, certain results highlight inverse proportionality betwixt Eros and relational behaviour such equally abstention [32] or destructive advice behaviour―as identified past Gottman―including antipathy, criticism, and defence [24], and with dysfunctional coping strategies such every bit interactional impulsiveness and authority [25]. Moreover, Burrow et al. [36] take recorded that Eros does not seem to correlate with the dysfunctional emotional reactions that couples oftentimes expressed in critical situations, such as emotional adultery of the partner.

In a study past Galinha et al. [29], Eros appears to also have a mediation function between attachment and subjective well-being, at to the lowest degree in Mozambican and Portuguese participants―though non in American participants. This consequence suggests that a combination of secure attachment and Eros contributes in greater measure to subjective well-existence in collectivist cultures―such as Mozambican and Portuguese cultures―as opposed to individualist cultures such as the American civilisation.

Despite the positive value Eros way in relationships is broadly confirmed, we take recorded a series of discrepant opinions. While Kimberly and Werner-Wilson [24] have observed a moderate correlation betwixt Eros and dyadic coping, degree of affinity, and relational satisfaction, Adil and Kamal [27] recorded zip correlation with secure attachment and, instead, an existing correlation with the attachment style defined by Bartholomew and Horowitz [43] every bit "preoccupied" (preoccupied zipper fashion, distinguished by a negative perception of i's self and others), though only in males. Goodboy and Myers [32] observed, instead, that Eros may exist in partners adopting negative relational behaviour, such as spying on the partner; the scholars argue that such behaviour may be adopted every bit a possible confirmation that the love relationship is experienced intensely and passionately. Ortalda and Clapetto [40] reported that Eros may even be correlated to feelings of jealousy. Smith and Klases [26] accept observed that the length of a relationship is a pregnant predictor of the Eros style, but in a negative sense: the longer the relationships last, the less individuals show the love style. In the just reviewed research in which the scholars analyzed marital couples with the actor?partner interdependence model, some differences between husband and wife were observed. In fact, while a passionate attitude toward love of a couple's partners influenced their own marital satisfaction (albeit to a lesser extent in the husbands) (thespian effect), simply the wife's Eros style had a meaning event on her partner's marital satisfaction (partner upshot).

Agape love style and its relational correlates

Distinguished past altruistic attitudes and behaviour expressed by people that are most interested in providing support, care, and respect to the partner, this love fashion is positively correlated to human relationship quality [28], length of the human relationship [26], and relational satisfaction [30] [33] [41], regardless of the level of education, religiousness, or gender [30]. Moreover, this type of partner: always tends towards a more secure attachment [42] ; considers commitment an of import feature in choosing a partner [39] ; tends towards avoiding subversive advice behaviour―such equally that identified by Gottman, including contempt, criticism, and defense [24] ―and negative strategies for conflict resolution, such equally authority, but―on the other paw―uses positive modes such as compromise [25]. Every bit recorded by Vedes et al. [33], a loftier level of Agape facilitates support to a stressed partner, and the joint effort to avert stressors, although the latter coping type seems to be rarer in couples who have been together for longer. Furthermore, couples adopting such love type do non seem to show negative relational behaviour, such equally jealousy or spying [32]. Couch et al. [36] have recorded that Afraid couples tend to not show dysfunctional reactions after having been cheated on by a partner. Nonetheless, when a human relationship ends Agape males in particular report that they feel negative emotions [39].

As for Eros, results that are partially contradictory with the bulk of research―which emphasizes its positivity―have been recorded. For example, Agape is recorded to not exist correlated to attachment security [27], but rather to an anxious dimension of zipper [26] and pathological beloved [34].

Moreover, in terms of the connectedness between Afraid style and relational satisfaction, Fehr et al. [xx] observed it does not exist, Vedes et al. [33] found a greater presence in women, and Kimberly and Werner-Wilson [24] found a greater presence in men. This last outcome has been confirmed as well in the inquiry of Gana et al. [23] who used the actor-partner interdependence model. In fact, they observed only the effect of a husband's Afraid style on his own marital satisfaction (actor issue). Neither pregnant result regarding the outcome of a wife's afraid style on her own conjugal satisfaction (histrion consequence) nor the effect of each partner'south Agape way on the relational satisfaction of the other 1 has been found.

Ludus honey mode and its relational correlates

With its playful and uncommitted attitude towards love, and its inverse proportionality with the intensity of the dearest sentiment [40], this fashion is by and large regarded as a gamble gene for the quality and stability of the romantic relationship. Coherently with its theoretical definition, and in a couple'south relationship pathway, the Ludus style appears to bear on all development, maintenance, and dissolution phases, in terms of weak effort in the relationship, lack of care for ane's commitment or that of i's partner, and positive feelings upon termination of the relationship [20] [39].

In the human relationship edifice phase Ludic people tend to want a lack of closeness [31] and to mistrust 1 another from the very beginning, although they withal show signs of desiring closeness, and evidence fluctuations in avoidance [42]. At the same fourth dimension, though more often than not experiencing relational dissatisfaction [29] [33] [41], ludic people make attempts to keep the relationship live, though they do and then through negative behaviour such as destructive conflict, infidelity, avoidance, a and stimulation of jealousy in the other, as well equally spying [32].

Ludus is considered a proficient predictor of behaviour triggering jealousy in the partner [32] [44] and destructive chatty behaviour such as that identified past Gottman equally The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse [24]. In conflict situations, Ludus couples tend to adopt―rather than constructive strategies such as compromise―destructive strategies, such as authority and a greater impulsiveness in interactions [25]. Burrow et al. [36] noted that when Ludus partners are cheated on, they do not manifest mail-traumatic concrete and psychological symptoms. Furthermore, Ludus is correlated to the avoidant form of attachment, as it is confirmed how partners with a playful mental attitude towards honey tend to build adult insecure-avoidant zipper relationships [29].

Despite such articulate and confirmed correlation betwixt ludic behaviour and run a risk factors for the quality and duration of a relationship, sure research projects highlight gender differences and―every bit supported by Vedes et al. [33] ―hint how, all the same today, the love fashion is more socially accustomed and considered more normal by and in men than in women. In fact, while in the view of Vedes et al. [33] relationship dissatisfaction is more frequent in ludic women rather than in men, Neto and Pinto [41] reported that adult men go as far every bit maxim they are satisfied of their honey life, whilst the love style appeared to be irrelevant in love satisfaction levels of young adults and older adults. Also in terms of a correlation with the preoccupied attachment form, Adil and Kamal [27] observed it is directly proportional in men and inversely proportional in women.

Storge love style and its relational correlates

In that location is a lack of research reporting significant data apropos this beloved manner, based upon friendship and spending time with i some other. It is considered a good predictor of married life quality [28] ; it is positively correlated with dyadic coping [24] and a progressive development of secure attachment [42] ; and in adults and older adults it is correlated with satisfaction in honey life [41]. Moreover, it is associated to functional strategies to solve conjugal disharmonize―such every bit compromise―and is inversely related to dysfunctional strategies such as impulsiveness in interaction [25]. Couch et al. [36] reveal how there is no evidence that persons adopting this way, along with Eros, Pragma, and Agape, suffer negative consequences on the physical-psychological wellness following emotional infidelity by a partner.

While Galinha et al. [29] noted an absenteeism of association betwixt relational satisfaction and secure attachment, in the meta-analysis performed past Acevedo and Aron [7] information technology was recorded that the mode is moderately correlated with relational satisfaction, mostly in long-term relationships rather than short-term relationships. It also appears to exist a common style in long-term relationships, and when the relationships stop, jealousy seems to be the main motivation [39]. On the other manus, Smith and Klases [26] observed how the longer the human relationship, the more than unlikely it is that partners show such friendly attitude in dearest.

Pragma dear style and its relational correlates

Typical of people who limited a pragmatic and rational mental attitude towards love, and for this reason tend to choose the partner based upon the characteristics they believe are important to them [39], Pragma appears to be linked to stable relationships [40], partially to the quality of married life [28], and to satisfaction in the relationship past adults and older adults [41]. It likewise contributes to the subjective well-beingness of people [29]. In disharmonize situations, businesslike people more often than not utilize strategies such as compromise and avoidance [25], and when they suffer emotional infidelity by their partner, they do not have strong reactions [36]. Partners with this style practice not appear to build an "anxious", fearful attachment fashion―distinguished past a negative perception of i'south self and others, according to the typology identified past Bartholomew and Horowitz [27] ―only instead show doubt and fluctuations in the formation of an emotional zipper [42]. Galinha et al. [29] have not recorded any influence of this love style on secure attachment and on perception of the relational satisfaction of the partner.

Mania honey manner and its relational correlates

Mania is the expression of a manic attitude towards love, implying possessive and obsessive behaviours: it is considered the purest grade of romantic obsession [7] [9]. Information technology is perhaps due to such feature that it is considered and consolidated as an important risk factor in quality of married life. Despite it involves people that tend to commit to the relationship [twenty], such people do non appear to exist able to build long-term relationships [26] or satisfying relationships [vii], with a few exceptions. In fact, Neto & Pinto [41] recorded a correlation betwixt beloved life satisfaction in manic male adults, merely not females. Mania is a strong predictor of negative relational behaviour. It is correlated to jealousy [forty] and exists in people expressing pathological jealousy [35] and pathological honey [34] [35], and that tend to manifest jealousy-evoking behaviour in the partner, even when they are shown amore by the latter [44]. Partners adopting a manic dear style tend to express an excessive need to be reassured by the partner [44], emotional highs and lows in the ability to exist shut to him/her [42], an broken-hearted-ambivalent attachment style [37], and preoccupation for the relation and its termination [39]. On the other hand, Smith and Klases [26] recorded an changed proportionality with the anxious component of attachment. Manic people tend to practise negative relational behaviour to go on the relationship alive, such every bit destructive conflict, infidelity, allowing control and spying [32]. In their cultural analysis, Galinha et al. [29] revealed how Mania is inversely proportional to secure zipper in their Mozambican sample, but not in the American or Portuguese participants.

Information technology is directly proportional to destructive advice behaviour such as that identified by Gottman [24], and is the master predictor of negative reactions following infidelity past a partner, in that people adopting this style tend to: alive infidelity in a traumatic manner, express unresolved feelings related to the event experienced, and suffer concrete symptoms, astute stress, unease, anxiety, low, and struggle to forgive [36].

4. Discussion

The results of the researches and studies considered in this review allow us to formulate an initial, though general, argument related to the importance of dearest and the diverse behaviours information technology is expressed with that touch on quality and elapsing of a human relationship. Information technology is thus besides a topic relevant to the field of psychology, and not only a matter for writers, artists, and poets. In the very conceptualization of beloved, aspects such as happiness, satisfaction, intimacy, passion, and commitment are cardinal dimensions. Information technology is sufficient to think the Triangular Theory of Honey by Sternberg and the numerous research projects referencing it and highlighting how the components identified past the scholar have a considerable importance for the relational satisfaction of partners [2] [45]. Furthermore, Fricker & Moore [46] claimed that love styles themselves branch from the developed attachment theory, and thus a clearer comprehension of relational satisfaction may exist obtained by combining the two perspectives.

This review too appears to confirm the variability of means to alive love and, in particular, that love styles seem to be separate from one another, and each provides different information on the quality and duration of a relationship, though a clear and linear model of correlation has not emerged to this twenty-four hours. This leads united states to believe that in that location exists a complex joint of honey and relational variables. A significant example is provided in the research by Hammock & Richardson [39], which revealed different correlations betwixt different love styles and variables in the relational phases: choosing a partner, maintenance, and termination of the relationship. At the same time, various researches underline how at that place continues to often exist gender inequality in the ways and directions in which the correlations between love styles and relational dimensions manifest themselves. This makes the widespread interpretation that men and women tend to express unlike attitudes towards love and love relationships more problematic [twoscore] [47]. In this perspective, it is believed that women are more oriented towards relationships and dearest, thus more influenced by love styles compared to men [33] [48]. A farther source of complication is the life wheel of a love relationship. In terms of love styles, the relational satisfaction curve seems to overcome the U-shape―as Vaillant and Vaillant [49] observed―and follows a varying proportionality to the life phases of a couple [7] [ix].

Moreover, the research papers reviewed emphasize non but the distinction between love styles, but besides the variability inside each style as opposed to the different factors of relationship quality. In fact, although the results of research and studies more often than not agree in stating the importance of Eros, Agape, and Ludus in the quality of a love relationship―a positive outcome in the outset two cases (as factors of protection and resources) and a negative effect in the 3rd case (every bit a factor of risk and vulnerability)―there is in whatsoever case a sure caste of variation and contradiction in the results recorded for the different styles. For case, while nearly the unabridged puddle of inquiry projects records a correlation betwixt Eros and positive characteristics of a relationship, certain other cases highlighted a correlation with negative behaviour in the human relationship maintenance phase, such as spying on the partner [32], and―in males―with preoccupied zipper style [27].

Despite the evolution we may tape in terms of interest for enquiry on love styles and types, likewise as their effects on well-being, personal and relationship health, there still remain a number of matters to deal with, which the articles reviewed agree to mainly exist the method-related aspects. We have indeed recorded how the majority of projects utilise convenience sampling merely―although this method is appropriate in sure circumstances, especially in exploratory research performed to generate new ideas―every bit stated past Lin and Huddleston-Casas [30], it is necessary to besides implement random sampling in order to know and generalize the results. Moreover, the samples were generally composed of students, and thus―as stated by Neto and Pinto [41] ―were not representative of the wider population of people involved in dearest relationships. In addition to this, the samples mostly comprised individuals and not couples. This prevented from recording what actually occurs in a relationship, and thus the possibility of performing a dyadic assessment, which is a method gathering wide attention in the field of research on relationship quality [50] [51] [52] [53]. In fact, a number of studies highlights the possibility of a reciprocal influence between partners, likewise in terms of the attitude towards dear [54]. Using a dyadic approach, for some of honey styles (as Eros and Agape) the reviewed research of Gana et al. [23] showed husband-wife non-independence in marital satisfaction. Therefore, acknowledging how the beloved arroyo of a partner influences not only his/her perception, behaviour, mental attitude, and feelings towards the human relationship, but fifty-fifty those of the partner, is a particularly interesting goal in the study of beloved. Indeed, upon a systemic approach, it may be stated that the influence 1 may have on his/her personal and relational wellness and well-existence does not simply depend on one's ain fashion of beingness, only likewise that of the partner.

Another chemical element of vulnerability is the use of cross-exclusive inquiry design, which is widely used but nonetheless limits the possibility of generalizing results and to brand inferential conclusions. Therefore, while it is easily presumed that beloved styles belong to a person before he/she gets involved in a love relationship, at the moment bidirectional or even opposite effects may not be ruled out. Thus, future research shall focus more than on a longitudinal blueprint in lodge to observe the path of beloved styles [13]. Besides, longitudinal studies may too represent a useful analysis of the transformations of love and the related attitudes and behaviour throughout the couple's relationship life. In the review, it emerges that there are authors who report the demand to distinguish short-term and long-term relationships in an assessment of the effects of love (see, for example, the meta-analysis by Acevedo & Aron, [7]. Clearly, to consider the development of a human relationship as well implies an assessment of the different dimensions and aspects that may exist in a couple's relational life, such every bit the existence of parenthood or not. There is a true lack of research on love styles in the latter scope; this is further attested by the fact that, on the other paw, in research concerning relationship quality it is widely documented how the presence of sons may become a take a chance factor [55] [56] [57].

Moreover, the papers taken into account in this review use self-study tools, which it would be necessary to pair with other techniques such equally observation, qualitative interviews, and neuroimaging. This would allow to obtain a more than detailed flick of phenomena, such equally dear, which take circuitous and multidimensional characteristics, as indeed underlined by Graham [9] upon determination of his meta-analysis. This broad and integrated assessment of different techniques may even be especially useful in the evaluation of sentimental relationships and―equally observed in the past by Weiss [58] ―may imply a bias related to the tendency to observe relational aspects positively when people are happy and satisfied of their marital life.

5. Conclusions

Although our review allows to have an idea of the land-of-the-art of knowledge and criticalities concerning this topic, and to offer indications for further research and its practical implications, it is nevertheless wise to keep into business relationship sure limits of this report. Starting time of all, it must be considered that the review was conducted by limiting the selection to contributions published on peer-review journals in Italian and English language. Moreover, there was a focus on relational aspects and dimensions that shall be in any case not dissociated with personal, social, and cultural variables, which are also widely analysed in literature on dearest styles. Furthermore, we carried out a systems research rather a meta-analysis―which is generally considered more accurate in gaining noesis on given phenomena. This selection was due to the fact that the empirical inquiry on honey styles―though expressing involvement in a deeper analysis of the topic―are even so not sufficiently abundant so as to allow a reliable inference on their importance and furnishings, in order to comprehend the relationship dynamics and thus arbitrate on relational health and well-being in the unlike contexts. A further limit is the fact that what we present is a narrative synthesis, subject as such to the arbitrary interpretation of the authors.

Nonetheless, the review widely highlights the relevance of the topic in the assessment of relationship wellness. Further developments on the noesis of this field, with broad-spectrum studies and researches that may take into account the complexity of the phenomenon and its peculiarities are therefore desirable. Among these, the most relevant seem to be the mechanisms in couple matching, in that love and its approaches primarily find expression in a sentimental human relationship. As well, it is in fact the complexity of the aspects and mechanisms highlighted that suggests the opportunity to reverberate upon the suitability and exhaustiveness of a categorization of love in mutually nullifying beloved styles and types, in order to investigate a possible natural dimension of the structure.

Further in-depth analyses may even accept interesting implications on the praxis, both in terms of assessment and in terms of preventive action. Hendrick [59] affirms the importance of an assessment of love styles in patients dealing with relationship issues. Cognition of dear styles, as asserted by Ortalda and Clapetto [forty], may allow an identification of the specific love style related to well-being or to unease or struggle, thus aiding the diagnostic phase in a clinical intervention. It is especially the identification of the polysemy of beloved and the different effects that living such sentiment may have on a human relationship that―every bit claimed past Neff and Karney [lx] ―may direct the focus not so much on the question of if and how much partners dearest each other, but how they love each other. Moreover, because the importance of a dyadic cess of issues in a couple, knowledge of the combination of love styles in partners may assist understand such criticalities. Think of a couple in which the husband is pragmatic (Pragma) and the wife is romantic and passionate (Eros): the male analyses the human relationship status and that which the wife tin offer, while the female loves to let herself get without any calculation; such couple may exist at risk. Even the clinical intervention should be addressed towards the distinguishing traits of the love styles existing in couples that are dysfunctional, conflicting, or in a crunch. Literature includes a number of experiences that may help understand how to address a clinical intervention focused on love. Even Yatim, Jusoh, Saper and Mukti [61] observed how the Afraid love style is primal to counselling, and discussed its implementation in a blazon of professional intervention that it is named after (Agape Dearest Counselling).

In determination, the inquiry significance on love, and in particular on love styles, is associated especially with the knowledge near the couple relationships and their functionality. In fact, the information that we can obtain from the analysis of this topic permits to enrich the range of risk and protective factors of marital quality and stability. Besides, the practical significance of these studies concerns mainly the attainment of the awareness about the relevance of love in the prevention and therapy of relation dysfunctionality.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Lee, J.A. (1973) The Colors of Love: An Exploration of the Means of Loving. New Press, Ontario.
[2]	Hoesni, Due south.M., Subhi, N., Alavi, K. and Wan Azreena, W.J. (2013) Exploring Love and Marital Satisfaction amongst Married Malay Males. Pertanika Periodical of Social Science and Humanities, 21, 59-68.
[iii]	Fletcher, G.J.O., Simpson, J.A., Campbell, 50. and Overall, N.C. (2015) Pair-Bonding, Romantic Beloved, and Development: The Curious Case of Human being Sapiens. Perspectives on Psychological Science, ten, 20-36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614561683
[4]	Kansky, J. (2018) What'southward Beloved Got to Do with It? Romantic Relationships and Well-Being. In: Diener, E., Oishi, S. and Tay, Fifty., Eds., Handbook of Well-Being, DEF Publishers, Salt Lake City, UT, 1-24.
[v]	O'Leary, Yard.D., Acevedo, B.P., Aron, A., Huddy, L. and Mashek, D. (2012) Is Long-Term Love More than a Rare Phenomenon? If So, What Are Its Correlates? Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 241-249. https://doi.org/ten.1177/1948550611417015
[6]	Dush, C.M.K. and Amato, P.R. (2005) Consequences of Relationship Status and Quality for Subjective Well-Existence. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22, 607-627. https://doi.org/ten.1177/0265407505056438
[7]	Acevedo, B.P. and Aron, A. (2009) Does a Long-Term Relationship Kill Romantic Love? Review of General Psychology, 13, 59-65. https://doi.org/x.1037/a0014226
[8]	Doron, G., Derby, D.S., Szepsenwol, O. and Talmor, D. (2012) Tainted Love: Exploring Relationship-Centered Obsessive-Compulsive Symptoms in Two Non-Clinical Cohorts. Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders, ane, xvi-24. https://doi.org/ten.1016/j.jocrd.2011.11.002
[9]	Graham, J.M. (2011) Measuring Honey in Romantic Relationships: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28, 748-771. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407510389126
[10]	Reynaud, M., Karila, Fifty., Blecha, L. and Benyamina, A. (2010) Is Beloved Passion an Addictive Disorder? The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Corruption, 36, 261-267. https://doi.org/10.3109/00952990.2010.495183
[xi]	Fisher, H.Eastward. (2014) The Tyranny of Love. Love Addiction—An Anthropologist's View. In: Rosenberg, K.P. and Feder, 50.C., Eds., Behavioral Addictions. Criteria, Bear witness, and Handling, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 237-265. https://doi.org/x.1016/B978-0-12-407724-9.00010-0
[12]	Fisher, Due east.E., Xu, X., Aron, A. and Chocolate-brown, Fifty.L. (2016) Intense, Passionate, Romantic love: A Natural Addiction? How the Fields That Investigate Romance and Substance Abuse Tin can Inform Each Other. Frontiers in Psychology, seven, Commodity 687. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00687
[13]	Berscheid, E. (2010) Love in the Fourth Dimension. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100318
[14]	Underwood, L.Thou. (2009) Empathetic Love: A Framework for Enquiry. In: Fehr, B., Sprecher, Southward., and Underwood, L.K., Eds., The Science of Compassionate Love: Theory, Research, and Applications, Wiley-Blackwell, West Sussex, UK, 3-25.
[15]	Berscheid, E. and Walster, East. (1978) Interpersonal Attraction. 2d Edition, Addison Wesley Reading, MA.
[xvi]	Collins, North.L., Kane, H.Southward., Metz, M.A., Cleveland, C., Khan, C., Winczewski, L., Bowen, J. and Prok, T., (2014) Psychological, Physiological, and Behavioral Responses to a Partner in Demand: The Role of Compassionate Love. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 31, 601-629. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407514529069
[17]	Hendrick, C. and Hendrick, Due south. (1986) A Theory and Method of Beloved. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, fifty, 392-402. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.l.2.392
[xviii]	Agus, Yard., Puddu, Fifty., Gonnelli, C. and Raffagnino, R. (2018) Honey Attitudes Scale-Brusk Form: The Preliminary Assessment of the Cistron Structure of Its Italian Version. Applied Psychology Bulletin, 66, xv-31.
[xix]	Lomas, T. (2018) The Flavours of Love: A Cantankerous-Cultural Lexical Analysis. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 48, 134-152. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12158
[20]	Fehr, B., Harasymchuk, C. and Sprecher, S. (2014) Compassionate Honey in Romantic Relationships: A Review and Some New Findings. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 31, 575-600. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407514533768
[21]	Neto, F. (2012) Compassionate Love for a Romantic Partner, Love Styles and Subjective Well-Being. Interpersona. An International Journal on Personal Relationships, 6, 23-39. https://doi.org/10.5964/ijpr.v6i1.88
[22]	Masuda, M. (2003) Meta-Analyses of Love Scales: Do Diverse Honey Scales Measure the Same Psychological Constructs? Japanese Psychological Research, 45, 25-37. https://doi.org/x.1111/1468-5884.00030
[23]	Gana, M., Saada, Y. and Untas, A. (2013) Effects of Dearest Styles on Marital Satisfaction in Heterosexual Couples: A Dyadic Approach. Spousal relationship & Family unit Review, 49, 754-772. https://doi.org/x.1080/01494929.2013.834025
[24]	Kimberly, C. and Werner-Wilson, R. (2013) From John Lee to John Gottman: Recognizing Intra- and Interpersonal Differences to Promote Marital Satisfaction. Journal of Human Sciences and Extension, i, 32-46.
[25]	Zacchilli, T.L., Hendrick, C. and Hendrick, South.Southward. (2009) The Romantic Partner Conflict Scale: A New Scale to Measure Relationship Disharmonize. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26, 1073-1096. https://doi.org/x.1177/0265407509347936
[26]	Smith, R. and Klases, A. (2016) Predictors of Love Attitudes: The Contribution of Cultural Orientation, Gender Zipper Style, Human relationship Length and Age in Participants from the UK and Hong Kong. Interpersona. An International Journal on Personal Relationships, 10, ninety-108. https://doi.org/10.5964/ijpr.v10i1.204
[27]	Adil, A. and Kamal, A. (2005) Relationship between Dearest Styles, Attachment Styles, and Narcissism among Academy Student. Indian Psychological Review, 64, 33-52.
[28]	Zadeh, Southward.Southward. and Bozorgi, Z.D. (2016) Relationship between the Love Styles, Personality Traits, and the Marital Life of Married Students. International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies, 746-756.
[29]	Galinha, I.C., Oishi, Due south., Pereira, C.R., Wirtz, D. and Esteves, F. (2014) Developed Attachment, Love Styles, Relationship Experiences and Subjective Well-Being: Cross-Cultural and Gender Comparing between Americans, Portuguese, and Mozambicans. Social Indicators Enquiry, 119, 823-852. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0512-7
[30]	Lin, L. and Huddleston-Casas, C.A. (2005) Agape Beloved in Couple Relationships. Marriage & Family Review, 37, 29-48. https://doi.org/10.1300/J002v37n04_03
[31]	Goodboy, A.1000. and Booth-Butterfield, M. (2009) Honey Styles and Desire for Closeness in Romantic Relationships. Psychological Reports, 105, 191-197. https://doi.org/10.2466/PR0.105.one.191-197
[32]	Goodboy, A.Thou. and Myers, S.A. (2010) Relational Quality Indicators and Love Styles every bit Predictors of Negative Relational Maintenance Behaviors in Romantic Relationships. Advice Reports, 23, 65-78. https://doi.org/x.1080/08934215.2010.511397
[33]	Vedes, A., Hilpert, P., Nussbeck, F.West., Randall, A.Grand., Bodenmann, G. and Lind W.R. (2016) Dear Styles, Coping, and Relationship Satisfaction: A Dyadic Approach. Personal Relationships, 23, 84-97. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12112
[34]	Sophia, E.C., Tavares, H., Berti, Yard.P., Pereira, A.P., Lorena, A., Mello, C., Gorenstein, C. and Zilberman, Chiliad.L. (2009) Pathological Love: Impulsivity, Personality, and Romantic Relationship. CNS Spectrums, 14, 268-274. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1092852900025438
[35]	Stravogiannis, A.50.D.C., Kim, H.S., Sophia, Due east.C., Sanches, C., Zilberman, M.L. and Tavares, H. (2018) Pathological Jealousy and Pathological Love: Apples to Apples or Apples to Oranges? Psychiatry Research, 259, 562-570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2017.11.029
[36]	Burrow, L.50., Baughman, 1000.R. and Derow, M.R. (2017) The Aftermath of Romantic Betrayal: What'south Love Got to Do with It? Current Psychology, 36, 504-515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-016-9438-y
[37]	Honari, B. and Saremi, A.A. (2015) The Study of Relationship between Attachment Styles and Obsessive Love Way. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 165, 152-159. http://Creativecommons.Org/Licenses/By-Nc-Nd/3.0/ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.617
[38]	Hendrick, C., Hendrick, South. and Dicke, A. (1998) The Love Attitudes Calibration: Curt Form. Periodical of Personal and Social Relationships, xv, 147-159. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407598152001
[39]	Hammock, Grand. and Richardson, D.Southward. (2011) Love Attitudes and Relationship Experience. The Journal of Social Psychology, 151, 608-624. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2010.522618
[40]	Ortalda, F. and Clapetto, S.C. (2010) Amore e benessere soggettivo: Una ricerca esplorativa. Psicologia della Salute, 2, 59-72.
[41]	Neto, F. and Pinto, 1000. da C. (2015) Satisfaction with Honey Life beyond the Adult Life Span. Applied Research Quality Life, 10, 289-304. https://doi.org/x.1007/s11482-014-9314-6
[42]	Karandashev, V., Benton, M., Edwards, C. and Wolters, 5. (2012) Development of Attachment in Romantic Relationship of Young Adults with Dissimilar Love Styles. Interpersona. An International Journal on Personal Relationships, 6, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.5964/ijpr.v6i1.87
[43]	Bartholomew, K. and Horowitz, L.G. (1991) Attachment Styles among Young Adults: A Test of a Four-Category Model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 226-244. https://doi.org/x.1037/0022-3514.61.2.226
[44]	Goodboy, A.Thou., Horan, S.M. and Berth-Butterfield, Thou. (2012) Intentional Jealousy-Evoking Behavior in Romantic Relationships as a Function of Received Partner Affection and Love Styles. Communication Quarterly, threescore, 370-385. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2012.688792
[45]	de Andrade, A.L., Wachelke, J.F.R. and Howat-Rodrigues, A.B.C. (2015) Human relationship Satisfaction in Young Adults: Gender and Love Dimensions. Interpersona. An International Journal on Personal Relationships, 9, nineteen-31. https://doi.org/x.5964/ijpr.v9i1.157
[46]	Fricker, J. and Moore, S. (2002) Relationship Satisfaction: The Role of Love Styles and Zipper Styles. Current Research in Social Psychology, seven, 1-16.
[47]	Regan, P.C. (2016) Loving Unconditionally: Demographic Correlates of the Agapic Love Style. Interpersona. An International Journal on Personal Relationships, 10, 28-35. https://doi.org/10.5964/ijpr.v10i1.199
[48]	Hendrick, S.S., Hendrick, C. and Adler, N.L. (1988) Romantic Relationships: Dear, Satisfaction, and Staying Together. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 980-988. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.980
[49]	Vaillant, C.O. and Vaillant, G.E. (1993) Is the U-Curve of Marital Satisfaction an Illusion? A forty-Year Study of Marriage. Periodical of Wedlock and Family, 55, 230-239. https://doi.org/x.2307/352971
[50]	Bouchard, G. (2018) A Dyadic Examination of Marital Quality at the Empty-Nest Stage. The International Journal of Aging and Man Development, 86, 34-50. https://doi.org/ten.1177/0091415017691285
[51]	Durtschi, J.A., Fincham, F.D., Cui, 1000., Lorenz, F.O. and Conger, R.D. (2011) Dyadic Processes in Early Spousal relationship: Attributions, Behavior, and Marital Quality. Family Relations, sixty, 421-434. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2011.00655.x
[52]	Landis, M., Peter-Wight, K., Martin M. and Bodenmann, K. (2013) Dyadic Coping and Marital Satisfaction of Older Spouses in Long-Term Marriage. The Periodical of Gerontopsychology and Geriatric Psychiatry, 26, 39-47. https://doi.org/10.1024/1662-9647/a000077
[53]	Papp, L.M. and Witt, N.L. (2010) Romantic Partners' Individual Coping Strategies and Dyadic Coping: Implications for Relationship Functioning. Periodical of Family unit Psychology, 24, 551-559. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020836
[54]	Reis, H.T., Maniaci, Yard.R. and Rogge, R.D. (2013) The Expression of Compassionate Love in Everyday Compassionate Acts. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 31, 651-676. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407513507214
[55]	Kwok, South.Y., Cheng, L., Grub, B.Due west. and Ling, C.C. (2015) The Spillover Result of Parenting on Marital Satisfaction among Chinese Mothers. Periodical of Kid and Family Studies, 24, 772-783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-013-9888-x
[56]	Schieman, S., Ruppanne, L. and Milkie, M.A. (2018) Who Helps with Homework? Parenting Inequality and Relationship Quality amid Employed Mothers and Fathers. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 39, 49-65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-017-9545-four
[57]	Shapiro, D. (2014) Stepparents and Parenting Stress: The Roles of Gender, Marital Quality, and Views about Gender Roles. Family Process, 53, 97-108. https://doi.org/x.1111/famp.12062
[58]	Weiss, R.L. (1980) Strategic Behavioral Marital Therapy: Toward a Model for Assessment and Intervention, Vol. ane. In: Vincent, J.P., Ed., Advances in Family Intervention, Cess and Theory, JAI Press, Greenwich, 229-271.
[59]	Hendrick, Due south. (2004) Close Relationships Research: A Resource for Couple and Family Therapists. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 30, thirteen-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2004.tb01219.x
[60]	Neff, Fifty.A. and Karney, B.R. (2009) Compassionate Love in Early on Marriage. In: Fehr, B., Sprecher, Due south. and Underwood, L., Eds., The Science of Compassionate Love: Theory, Research, and Application, Wiley-Blackwell, West Sussex, 201-222.
[61]	Yatim, A.M, Jusoh, A.J., Saper, Northward. and Mukti, T.A. (2015) Afraid Honey Counseling Module. The International Periodical of Social Scientific discipline, 37, 128-132.

lowerycauther.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation.aspx?paperid=89616

Share this post